Cut off date for eligibility is the last date for filing for application forms

Mohit Singh v. State of UP, 2012 (30) LCD 120

Person against whom malice is alleged should be made party by name

Shyam Baboo v. State of UP, 2012 (30) LCD 404 (All)

Compliance with Rule 3A of Chapter XXII - Public Interest Litigation

Credentials of the Petitioners to be shown and proved - 2012 (1) LCD 394 (following (2010) 3 SCC 402)

It must be stated in the PIL that "the result of the litigation will not lead to any undue loss to any person, body of persons or the State"  - 2012 (1) LCD 666 (but requirement dispensed with as interim measure)


See also MISB 11510 of 2011

Limitation of 59 days condoned

2011 AWC (3) 2745 (SC) - Indian Oil Corp v. Subrata

Stamp Duty Potential value

Agricultural being valued as residential absent declaration under Section 143
2011 (3) AWC 3093 - Sunti Bunti Automobiles (Pankaj Mithal)

public purpose may change one from another

In Union of India v. Jaswant Rai Kochhar reported inMANU/SC/0358/1996 : 1996 (3) SCC 491 land acquired for housing scheme was utilised for commercial purpose i.e. a District Centre. This Court held in that matter that it is will settled law that land sought to be acquired forone public purpose may be used for another public purpose. In State of Maharashtra v. Mahadeo Deoman Rai reported in MANU/SC/0471/1990 : 1990 (3) SCC 579 yet another Bench of three Judges had held that requirement of public purpose may change from time to time but the change will not vitiate the acquisition proceeding.

 

Also: JT2011(12)SC298

"Person Aggrieved"

Allahabad High Court

MISC. SINGLE No. - 7254 of 2011 (Committee of Management)

MISC. SINGLE No. - 1794 of 2010 (Subsequent withdrawal of power to prosecute, loss of locus standi)

MISC. SINGLE No. - 316 of 2012 (Subsequent allottee) 

Supreme Court

(1975) 2 SCC 702 (Bar Council v. MV Dabholkar)

(1976) 1 SCC 671 (Jasbhai Motibhai)