Courts will not interfere in process of evaluation , the process of ranking and selection of candidates for admission with reference to their performance, the process of achieving the objective of selecting candidates who will be better equipped to suit the specialised courses, are all technical matters in academic field and the courts will not interfere in such process.
Sanchit Bansal (2012) 1 SCC 157
contact for clarification or assistance at talha (at) talha (dot) in
Search The Civil Litigator
Sunday, July 1, 2012
Court must examine the pleadings and then only pass orders
The court will examine the pleadings for specificity as also the supporting material for sufficiency and then pass appropriate orders.
(2012) 5 SCC 370
Maria Margarida v. Erasmo Jack De Sequeira
(2012) 5 SCC 370
Maria Margarida v. Erasmo Jack De Sequeira
English Civil Procedure Rules and Woolf's Report relied upon in India
(2012) 5 SCC 370
Maria Margarida v. Erasmo Jack De Sequeira
Maria Margarida v. Erasmo Jack De Sequeira
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Building is "service". 2012 5 SCC 359
Sale of fully developed plots with assured facilities is "service"
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
a person convicted on charges of corruption should not be allowed to continue in service until his conviction is set aside by appellate court. The High Court in appeal has not stayed
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 66949 of 2010 (Allahabad) (2010 ILR 1278)
Constitution of India Art. 226-Revision of Subsistence allowance-petitioner-after conviction under 7/3 prevention of corruption Act-during pendency of
appeal-granted bail-unless conviction set-a-side not entitled for relief claimed.
appeal-granted bail-unless conviction set-a-side not entitled for relief claimed.
Held: Para 8 In our opinion, a person convicted on charges of corruption should not be allowed to continue in service until his conviction is set aside by appellate court. The High Court in appeal has not stayed
the conviction of the petitioner.
the conviction of the petitioner.
Every Tribunal has got inherent power to recall an order of DD is sufficient cause is shown
2012 (2) AWC 1984
Kesarwani Zarda Bhandar v. Subhash Chandra Kesarwani
Monday, June 25, 2012
Service of Process on wife is not good in law
Service of process on wife is not valid service in law under Order 5, Rule 15
2012 (3) ALJ 212 (Kishore Kumar Arora v. Harvindar )
2012 (3) ALJ 212 (Kishore Kumar Arora v. Harvindar )
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)