AIR 2011 MP 205
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
contact for clarification or assistance at talha (at) talha (dot) in
Search The Civil Litigator
Showing posts with label debt recovery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debt recovery. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Stay of SARFAESI proceedings
No civil court or consumer forum can stay the proceedings under SARFAESI. AIR 2011 Ori 164
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Publicity to a debt
In England, it is an offence by statute to unduly publicise the existence of any debit with the object of concerning the debtor to pay. This is unlawful harassment. Argyll v. Argyll, (1965) 1 All ER 611 (Thomas J.)
Saturday, June 4, 2011
Winding up - disputed debt
Dispute in relation to a debt means dispute between the petitioner and the respondent company. There is a privity of contract, and dispute between third party and the respondent company is not relevant.
Sunil Kothari v. Today Homes, (2011) 107 SCL 216 (Delhi)
Sunil Kothari v. Today Homes, (2011) 107 SCL 216 (Delhi)
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Foreign Guarantee and FEMA
If the said guarantee declaration had been executed by the respondent in breach of any provisions of FEMA or FERA, the respondent could be prosecuted for the same. But, it could not be said that the guarantee was null, void or could not be enforced on that ground.
There was no doubt that a debt was owed by the respondent to the petitioner and, further the petitioner did not have to wait to obtain a decree from civil court on the basis of the guarantee declaration.
[2011] 106 SCL 433 (delhi)
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
There was no doubt that a debt was owed by the respondent to the petitioner and, further the petitioner did not have to wait to obtain a decree from civil court on the basis of the guarantee declaration.
[2011] 106 SCL 433 (delhi)
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Guarantee - when the debt accrues
The liability of the guarantor would not arise until (a) the borrower has failed; and (b) a notice of demand has been served on the guarantor. Only then can it be said that the debt would accrue. 1981 51 comp cases 301
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
Monday, February 21, 2011
SARFAESI Act, challenge to deposit requirement
Condition of pre-deposit of 25% is not unreasonable.
courts cannot substitute legal provisions nor can can they legislate.
courts cannot substitute legal provisions nor can can they legislate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)