Don't get hyper technical, see and try to decide matters on merit. From the conduct of the of the party it can't be said that it had been absolutely callous and negligent.. It prosecuted the matter after it became aware of the non-appearance of its advocate. 2010 6 SCC 786 -------------------------------------- Sent from handheld device
Not filing separate application for condonation of delay is not consequential if otherwise averments are made and sufficient cause is there (2010) 12 SCC 159 -------------------------------------- Sent from handheld device
In absence of a nexus between license of a driver and the accident, insurer would not be liable to allow claim on non-standard basis. United India Insurance Company v. Gaj Pal Singh Rawat, 2010 NCJ 37 (NC)
The Complainant was not a consumer as he has not hired the services of the Central Government for any purpose whatsoever nor he purchased anything so as to bring his status within the category of 'consumer'. As a matter of fact he himself rendered services to the Central Government in lieu of consideration.