New Argument on Fact is not permitted in Appeal

This new argument therefore on a question of fact cannot be permitted to be taken more so in the absence of any evidence having been brought on record in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Bharat Singh and others v. State of Haryana and others, MANU/SC/0047/1988 : AIR 1988 SC 2181

When foundation goes edifice falls

Chairman Cum Managing Director, Coal India Limited v. Ananta Saha, (2011) 5 SCC 142

Sublato fundamento cadit opus

Sent from phone

ITC - Entry Tax matter

ITC Limited v. State of UP, 2012 1 ADJ 607

Upheld the validity of entry tax act 2007

Sent from phone

Non execution of sale deed despite allotment

Ganesh Prasad v. LDA Lucknow, 2012 (1) ADJ. 247 (DB) (LB)

Sent from phone

Residential - commercial, town plan cannot be altered, no banking activity in residential area

2012 2 SCC 232
RK Mittal v. State of UP

Master plan has force of law, it has to be amended by statutory procedure and not be exec order.

Sent from phone

Termination of Lease: 106 of TP Act

Case 1 (Supreme Court - 2009) : (2009)15SCC693

para 19:  A simple tenancy can be terminated by service of notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. Once a valid notice is served, the tenant becomes trespasser.

 

Case 2 ( Allahabad HC - single judge) : 2010 1 AWC742

para 9. It is further found from the finding recorded by both the authorities that a finding of fact has been recorded regarding service of notice. The contents of notice may not be very happily worded but the gist and meaning of the notice are very clear which terminates the tenancy of the petitioner immediately on the date of receipt of notice and to vacate the premises within 30 days. In my opinion this is the only requirement in law for giving notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. The notice cannot be sought to be invalid unless and until it is proved by the person concerned that there is no mention in the notice that he is in arrears for more than 3 months or there is no whisper in the notice regarding termination of the tenancy immediately after the expiry of 30 days from the date of receipt of the notice. A clear finding has been recorded by the Judge, Small Causes Court as well as by the revisional authority. In the notice, it has clearly been mentioned that within a period of 30 days, he has to vacate the premises.

 

   Case 3 (Sup Ct - 7 judges) AIR1979SC1745,

para 7. It is this clause which brings into operation the requirement of Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. Without adverting to the effect and the details of waiver of forfeiture, waiver of notice to quit, relief against forfeiture for non-payment of rent etc. as provided for in Sections 112 to 114A of the Transfer of Property Act, suffice it to say that under the said Act no ground of eviction of a tenant has to be made out once a contractual tenancy is put to an end by service of a valid notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. Until and unless the lease is determined, the lessee is entitled to continue in possession. Once it is determined it becomes open to the lessor to enforce his right of recovery of possession of the property against him.

 

Police regulation doesn't override CrPC

(2011) 9 SCC 569

Sent from phone

Holding over - Lease

2010 28 LCD 1790

Giriraj Prasad v. Shyam Sundar Agarwal

No notice of termination necessary for fixed term tenancy

Sent from phone

Compulsory retirement is not a punishment

2011 10 SCC 1-N

Sent from phone

Justice hurried is justice buried

2012 2 SCC 584, para 23

Sent from phone