2011 (29) LCD 2109 (SC)
contact for clarification or assistance at talha (at) talha (dot) in
Search The Civil Litigator
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Transfer at the instance of MLA
MLA is elected representative of the people, and as such even if transfer is done at his instance, there cannot be any grievance. 2007 (8) SCC 150
Land Acquisition - Urgency in "Residential Purpose" acquisition
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 17 - The power of urgency by the Government for a public purpose like Residential Scheme cannot be invoked as a rule but has to be by way of exception.
MARCH 21, 2012
CIVIL APPEAL No. 3813 of 2007
Monday, June 18, 2012
Cut off date for eligibility is the last date for filing for application forms
Mohit Singh v. State of UP, 2012 (30) LCD 120
Person against whom malice is alleged should be made party by name
Shyam Baboo v. State of UP, 2012 (30) LCD 404 (All)
Compliance with Rule 3A of Chapter XXII - Public Interest Litigation
Credentials of the Petitioners to be shown and proved - 2012 (1) LCD 394 (following (2010) 3 SCC 402)
It must be stated in the PIL that "the result of the litigation will not lead to any undue loss to any person, body of persons or the State" - 2012 (1) LCD 666 (but requirement dispensed with as interim measure)
See also MISB 11510 of 2011
See also MISB 11510 of 2011
Sunday, June 17, 2012
Stamp Duty Potential value
Agricultural being valued as residential absent declaration under Section 143
2011 (3) AWC 3093 - Sunti Bunti Automobiles (Pankaj Mithal)
2011 (3) AWC 3093 - Sunti Bunti Automobiles (Pankaj Mithal)
Friday, June 15, 2012
public purpose may change one from another
In Union of India v. Jaswant Rai Kochhar reported inMANU/SC/0358/1996 : 1996 (3) SCC 491 land acquired for housing scheme was utilised for commercial purpose i.e. a District Centre. This Court held in that matter that it is will settled law that land sought to be acquired forone public purpose may be used for another public purpose. In State of Maharashtra v. Mahadeo Deoman Rai reported in MANU/SC/0471/1990 : 1990 (3) SCC 579 yet another Bench of three Judges had held that requirement of public purpose may change from time to time but the change will not vitiate the acquisition proceeding.
Also: JT2011(12)SC298
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)