Rose Valley Real Estates & Construction Ltd v. SEBI, [2011] 106 SCL 598
While the power under Art 226 can be exercised for (a) judicially reviewing a decision or order of the Board in absence of a functioning Tribunal; and (b) for examining the validity of the decision or order when its validity is challenged questioning the vires of the statute or the provision under which the decision or order is made, it can also also be exercised in the interest of justice or for preventing a miscarriage of justice, e.g. when the aggrieved person is unable to appeal under Section 15T or 15Z for absence of decision or order of the Board or the Tribunal.
While the power under Art 226 can be exercised for (a) judicially reviewing a decision or order of the Board in absence of a functioning Tribunal; and (b) for examining the validity of the decision or order when its validity is challenged questioning the vires of the statute or the provision under which the decision or order is made, it can also also be exercised in the interest of justice or for preventing a miscarriage of justice, e.g. when the aggrieved person is unable to appeal under Section 15T or 15Z for absence of decision or order of the Board or the Tribunal.
No comments:
Post a Comment